http://www.anomalousaperture.com/2008/08/a-simple-telephone-line-quality-test-for-adsl-uk-only/ Just another WordPress weblog Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:38:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 http://www.anomalousaperture.com/2008/08/a-simple-telephone-line-quality-test-for-adsl-uk-only/comment-page-1/#comment-18 Rob Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:51:33 +0000 http://www.anomalousaperture.com/?p=11#comment-18 Fast test has changed now and now requires a pin or authorised mobile phone number. Shame. Fast test has changed now and now requires a pin or authorised mobile phone number. Shame.

]]> http://www.anomalousaperture.com/2008/08/a-simple-telephone-line-quality-test-for-adsl-uk-only/comment-page-1/#comment-14 Recent Links Tagged With "aperture" - JabberTags Sat, 08 Nov 2008 05:20:00 +0000 http://www.anomalousaperture.com/?p=11#comment-14 [...] public links >> aperture A simple telephone line quality test for ADSL (UK only) Saved by lostmad100 on Fri 07-11-2008 Review of Apple Aperture Saved by DorineRuter on Thu [...] [...] public links >> aperture A simple telephone line quality test for ADSL (UK only) Saved by lostmad100 on Fri 07-11-2008 Review of Apple Aperture Saved by DorineRuter on Thu [...]

]]> http://www.anomalousaperture.com/2008/08/a-simple-telephone-line-quality-test-for-adsl-uk-only/comment-page-1/#comment-12 wayne bennett Sat, 25 Oct 2008 17:53:04 +0000 http://www.anomalousaperture.com/?p=11#comment-12 i have tried and tested the above, and yet i still have no dialing tone, nor anyone speaking to me from the other end of the test line, but i still have my internet connection, what else could i try to get my phones working again, i have been and bought a new phone thinking it could be the old 1 i was using, but it still does not work. i have tried and tested the above, and yet i still have no dialing tone, nor anyone speaking to me from the other end of the test line, but i still have my internet connection, what else could i try to get my phones working again, i have been and bought a new phone thinking it could be the old 1 i was using, but it still does not work.

]]>